![]() Soviet military planners organize tanks with the first generation of tanks up to 1950, and four generations of tanks (with the first main battle tank being the third-generation T-64), while American strategists organize main battle tanks into three generations. Main battle tanks are often classified as belonging to a particular generation, although the actual definition and membership in these generations are not defined. If the BRs were expanded out to say 12 we could push these vehicles higher without compromising their performance.Chronological listing of main battle tanks British Centurion Main Battle Tank T-54 Main Battle Tank BMP and Object 120 are ridiculous at 7.3, especially when you consider the Chinese version has a tandem warhead ATGM with 900mm of pen yet its at the same BR. ![]() Rather than lowering BRs, I think we need to start raising them. In my experience with the Tiger2(either one) getting uptiered to 7.3 is not very uncommon, and majority of 7.3 vehicles have APDS or HEAT-FS which completely demolishes Tiger2 armor and are often more maneuverable then german heavysĮDIT: They are not "Modern" tanks but they are significantly better then late war german heavys The IS-6 isn't postwar, it was produced and tested in 1944 before development ceased in 1945 and it has the same rounds as the IS-2, albeit with a faster reload. Tiger 2s and maus would dominate if they only faced world war 2. ![]() Originally posted by hi_1002:You cannot face modern tanks at 6.7 and your gun can penetrate many tanks of the cold war.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |